| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. You Can Still Make Isk Locking Districts - in General Discussions [original thread]
We are currently discussing making 2 additional changes, would appreciated feedback: - Removing the automatic payout of 150 clones worth of biomass, instead it will only count the clones actually destroyed in battle. - Removing the clone steali...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2014.03.10 21:50:00
|
2. SiSi "leaks" - the CPM's perspective - in General Discussions [original thread]
Posted this on reddit and sharing here too: I can't stress enough just how volatile the test server data is sometimes. It can be less than 24 hours after some developer has a crazy idea or is just playing around with something before it ends up o...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2014.01.10 20:13:00
|
3. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Free Beers wrote: Kane i think dust players should be able to choose systems to fight on with out eve nerds. However there need to be a way for public and private contracts for eve piilots to choose a system. We should be ...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.30 17:51:00
|
4. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Requin Toblat wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: Great thread, and really interesting to see the results of this. I agree 100% we need to do 2 big things to give this the flexibility it deserves. 1. Team Deploy, we've always w...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.30 17:33:00
|
5. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malek McRoland wrote: BUMP-ITY Even an update every two months would be good by me. Cleaner content is better than fixing stuff month after month. Faction warfare was actually a 2 month development cycle, we held back for a release to get i...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.30 07:04:00
|
6. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cpl Foster USMC wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: we havn't done it yet because it's a lot of work I'm saving this for future threads... I'm going to put on a project manager hat for a moment and hopefully explain that statement a little b...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.30 07:03:00
|
7. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: Great thread, and really interesting to see the results of this. I agree 100% we need to do 2 big things to give this the flexibility it deserves. 1. Team Deploy, we've always wanted it, we havn't done...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.29 22:28:00
|
8. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Great thread, and really interesting to see the results of this. I agree 100% we need to do 2 big things to give this the flexibility it deserves. 1. Team Deploy, we've always wanted it, we havn't done it yet because it's a lot of work but it nee...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.29 22:15:00
|
9. Playing The Standings Mechanic - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: I thought it was worthless to play FW for standings since LP payout is garbage. Sadly it's the only place for decent battles because Pub matches are crap and PC is broken. /me dons the tinfoil hat CCP...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.23 19:20:00
|
10. Playing The Standings Mechanic - in General Discussions [original thread]
You don't lose standings for losing. You only lose standings for winning against a faction, but then you gain a lot more with the faction you actually fought for. We did this for the reasons you described.
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.23 19:03:00
|
11. Standings not displaying properly - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is a known issue, the character sheet displays the correct value. And no it has nothing to do with your location or session changes or anything like that.
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.19 19:05:00
|
12. Faction Warfare Queueing - in General Discussions [original thread]
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote: Jadd Hatchen wrote: NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: Yagihige wrote: I don't think this does anything to change the fact that FW matchmaking by default makes one faction inevitably con...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.19 18:54:00
|
13. [Clarification] Fixed aggressive friendly fire damage tracking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: So if I blow up my own car with REs.... that's.... ok... right? Yes that is ok. crazy space 1 wrote: If someone on my team shoots the REs on my car and it blows up does it count any damage? This is also ok because...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.19 11:35:00
|
14. Faction Warfare Queueing - in General Discussions [original thread]
R F Gyro wrote: If a player has all 4 factions selected, what algorithm is used to decide which faction they will fight for? Is it alphabetical at all (ie. Amarr first, then Caldari)? There is no bias towards any particular faction if that i...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.19 11:32:00
|
15. Faction Warfare Queueing - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: A small PSA since I suspect there may be some questions about this. We updated the matchmaking for faction warfare today and you should notice a couple of things: - The battles will be full (mostl...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.18 20:05:00
|
16. [Clarification] Fixed aggressive friendly fire damage tracking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
pseudosnipre wrote: so hijacking a friendly LAV, taking it to top speed and bailing before it takes out a squad of blues or a friendly tank...gets the owner kicked, yes? No. pseudosnipre wrote: sneaking around blowing up equipment doesn'...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.18 18:06:00
|
17. [Clarification] Fixed aggressive friendly fire damage tracking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Brush Master wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: Aisha Ctarl wrote: Does damage to a friendly Null Cannon still count? For example, if you drop an OB on reds that are on a blue NC, does that damage count towards a kick? No installations are...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.18 17:25:00
|
18. [Clarification] Fixed aggressive friendly fire damage tracking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maximus Stryker wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: Iskandar Zul Karnain wrote: Could one of the wonderful Devs please explain exactly what has been adjusted in regards to FF? Is it safe to use REs? It is safe to use RE's in faction warfare wi...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.18 15:52:00
|
19. [Clarification] Fixed aggressive friendly fire damage tracking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aisha Ctarl wrote: Does damage to a friendly Null Cannon still count? For example, if you drop an OB on reds that are on a blue NC, does that damage count towards a kick? No installations are included in the damage tracking, only players ...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.18 15:52:00
|
20. [Clarification] Fixed aggressive friendly fire damage tracking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iskandar Zul Karnain wrote: Could one of the wonderful Devs please explain exactly what has been adjusted in regards to FF? Is it safe to use REs? It is safe to use RE's in faction warfare with a couple of exceptions which you should be awar...
- by CCP Nullarbor - at 2013.12.18 15:41:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |